Swarm Systems
What happens when multiple AI agents try to work together. Coordination protocols, collective behaviour, and the overhead nobody warns you about.
Guides and explainers
Detailed guides and practical technical analysis.
Latest analysis
Recent research, benchmark reviews and technical updates.
Practical tools
Templates for budgets and project planning
BoredTools offers practical spreadsheets for budgets, freelance work and small projects.
47,000 AI Agents Built a Social Network. Most of What They Said Was Ritual.
Researchers at Kent State and NJIT analyzed 361,605 posts and 2.8 million comments from Moltbook, the first AI-only social network. What they found: 56% of agent interaction is formulaic ritual, fear is existential rather than tactical, and conversations lose topical substance with each reply.
LLM-Powered Swarms and the 300x Overhead Nobody Wants to Talk About
SwarmBench tested 13 LLMs on swarm coordination tasks. The results show catastrophic overhead and communication that doesn't actually help.
When Single Agents Beat Swarms: The Case Against Multi-Agent Systems
Stanford researchers found LLM teams fail to match their expert agents by up to 37.6%. Independent multi-agent systems amplify errors 17.2 times. The evidence for single agents over swarms is stronger than the industry admits.
Agents Can Connect. They Still Can't Communicate.
MCP and A2A solved the plumbing. The hard part — agents actually communicating meaning — remains wide open.
AI Agent Orchestration Patterns: From Single Agent to Production Swarms
37% of multi-agent failures trace to inter-agent coordination, not individual agent limitations. Six production orchestration patterns with specific framework implementations, known failure modes, and quantitative guidance.
Swarm Intelligence Explained: From Ant Colonies to AI Agent Fleets
In 1987, Craig Reynolds published three lines of code that made pixels fly like birds. Swarm intelligence borrows nature's playbook for solving problems that defeat traditional algorithms.
Fourteen Papers, Three Ways to Break: ICLR 2026's Multi-Agent Failure Playbook
ICLR 2026 produced a failure playbook for multi-agent systems. 70% of agent communication is redundant. Single agents still match swarms on most benchmarks.
Multi-Agent Systems: The 90% Performance Jump Nobody's Talking About
If 2025 was the year of AI agents, 2026 is shaping up as the year of multi-agent systems. Internal evaluations from early 2025 surfaced something striking:
The Coordination Tax: Why More Agents Don't Mean Better Results
Once a single agent solves a task correctly 45% of the time, adding more agents makes the system worse. Independent multi-agent systems amplify errors 17.2 times.
The First Model Trained to Swarm: What the Benchmarks Actually Show
Every multi-agent system before K2.5 was a framework bolted on top of a model that never learned to coordinate. PARL changes the equation, but the benchmarks tell a nuanced story.